How does articulatory technique differ from MET and MFR?

• A. Articulatory technique uses small, passive, rhythmic joint mobilizations to improve ROM; MET uses active muscle contractions against a counterforce; MFR uses sustained fascial stretch.
• B. Articulatory technique uses resisted muscle contractions.
• C. Articulatory technique uses rapid joint thrusts.
• D. Articulatory technique uses only warming up.

Answer: (A)

Articulatory technique is a passive, rhythmical joint mobilization performed by the clinician to improve the range of motion. The joint is moved in small, precise motions with the patient relaxed, so the restriction is addressed through gentle articulation rather than active muscle effort. This contrasts with muscle energy technique, which relies on the patient actively contracting a muscle against a counterforce, then relaxing to allow greater length and mobility. It also differs from myofascial release, which uses a sustained stretch or traction of fascial tissues to release restrictions rather than brief, rhythmic joint movements. So the defining difference is passive, small, rhythmic joint motion aimed at improving ROM, versus active muscle contractions in MET and the sustained fascial stretching of MFR.