Which statement best describes the difference between still technique and counterstrain?

Study for COMLEX OMM with flashcards and multiple choice questions. Get hints and explanations for each question. Prepare effectively for your exam!

Multiple Choice

Which statement best describes the difference between still technique and counterstrain?

Explanation:
The difference between these two techniques lies in how they interact with the tissues: Still technique is a dynamic, rapid mobilization of the joint and surrounding soft tissues to restore motion, while counterstrain is a passive, sustained hold in a position of comfort that gently stretches tissues to reset neural reflexes and reduce muscle hypertonicity. So, still technique uses quick, rhythmic joint and tissue movements to overcome restrictions and freer motion, whereas counterstrain relies on placing the patient in a position of ease and maintaining a sustained stretch to lessen spindle activity and tone. This explains why the statement describing rapid joint mobilizations for Still technique and a sustained fascial stretch for counterstrain best captures their difference.

The difference between these two techniques lies in how they interact with the tissues: Still technique is a dynamic, rapid mobilization of the joint and surrounding soft tissues to restore motion, while counterstrain is a passive, sustained hold in a position of comfort that gently stretches tissues to reset neural reflexes and reduce muscle hypertonicity.

So, still technique uses quick, rhythmic joint and tissue movements to overcome restrictions and freer motion, whereas counterstrain relies on placing the patient in a position of ease and maintaining a sustained stretch to lessen spindle activity and tone. This explains why the statement describing rapid joint mobilizations for Still technique and a sustained fascial stretch for counterstrain best captures their difference.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy